Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/South Carolina
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

South Carolina

34th of 51Stable-3 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
34th
vs. national avg
-2
Region
South
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

South Carolina ranks 34th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it near the national middle. Its composite of 53 sits 2 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by a comparatively low fire burden. South Carolina is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 16 points below what its risk profile would predict. Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require. South Carolina ranks 27th in funding per capita and 33rd in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
37 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
57 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
48 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
25
17
Burden+25 pts
Vulnerability+11 pts
Readiness+17 pts
National Fireground Score53

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-16
actual − expected
Expected 53
Actual 37
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from South Carolina's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / high funding

Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require.

Fire grant funding
$56.4M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$80
27th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$37
per capita
Emergency services investment
$63
per capita
Fire burden rank
33rd
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
27th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingSC
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score-1 since 2020· worseningRank fell 3 · 3134

Risers & fallers reflect movement in South Carolina's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire incidents per 1,000 residents ranks 22nd nationally (4.2 per 1k) — a top differentiator for South Carolina.

Biggest weakness

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 41st of 51 (37 USD), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Investment ahead of burden

Funding per capita (27th) outpaces measured fire burden (33rd) — resources appear well ahead of current risk.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 26th percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (37 %, 33rd) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
4.2 per 1k
42nd
22nd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.1 per 100k
40th
25th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
6.2 per 100k
44th
23rd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$96
46th
24th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Population in poverty
16.4%
66th
34th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
18.6%
68th
35th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
37%
64th
33rd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
37%
64th
33rd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.59
68th
35th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$11
26th
38th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$142
38th
32nd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$37
20th
41st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.3 per 1k
24th
39th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
99%
92nd
5th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where South Carolina stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.