Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Tennessee
0/ 100
Strong
National Fireground Score · 2024

Tennessee

1st of 51Rising+9 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
1st
vs. national avg
+14
Region
South
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Tennessee ranks 1st of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it among the strongest in the country. Its composite of 69 sits 14 points above the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by solid readiness and funding and a comparatively low fire burden. Tennessee is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 25 points below what its risk profile would predict. Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require. Tennessee ranks 1st in funding per capita and 41st in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
30 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
52 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
82 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
28
29
Burden+28 pts
Vulnerability+12 pts
Readiness+29 pts
National Fireground Score69

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-25
actual − expected
Expected 55
Actual 30
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Tennessee's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / high funding

Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require.

Fire grant funding
$119.1M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$104
1st nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$52
per capita
Emergency services investment
$92
per capita
Fire burden rank
41st
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
1st
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingTN
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+4 since 2020· improvingRank unchanged · 11

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Tennessee's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Federal fire grant funding per capita ranks 1st nationally (16.7 USD) — a top differentiator for Tennessee.

Biggest weakness

Population in poverty ranks 25th of 51 (15 %), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Investment ahead of burden

Funding per capita (1st) outpaces measured fire burden (41st) — resources appear well ahead of current risk.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (33 %, 25th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
3 per 1k
18th
11th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
0.6 per 100k
8th
10th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
4.7 per 100k
30th
16th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$51
14th
8th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
15%
48th
25th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
16.6%
46th
25th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
33%
44th
25th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
32%
44th
24th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.43
28th
17th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$17
100th
1st2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$229
98th
2nd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$52
82nd
10th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3.8 per 1k
76th
13th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
97%
78th
11th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Tennessee stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.