Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Alabama
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Alabama

15th of 51Stable+2 ranksLow data coverage
National rank
15th
vs. national avg
+5
Region
South
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Alabama ranks 15th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the upper tier nationally. Its composite of 60 sits 5 points above the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by solid readiness and funding and a comparatively low fire burden, with above-median community vulnerability also weighing on the result. Alabama is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 31 points below what its risk profile would predict. Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require. Alabama ranks 3rd in funding per capita and 37th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
34 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
72 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
76 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
26
27
Burden+26 pts
Vulnerability+7 pts
Readiness+27 pts
National Fireground Score60

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-31
actual − expected
Expected 65
Actual 34
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Alabama's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / high funding

Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require.

Fire grant funding
$71.5M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$99
3rd nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$59
per capita
Emergency services investment
$81
per capita
Fire burden rank
37th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
3rd
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingAL
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+2 since 2020· improvingRank rose 2 · 1715

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Alabama's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 2nd nationally (59 USD) — a top differentiator for Alabama.

Biggest weakness

Social vulnerability index ranks 49th of 51 (0.75 index), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Investment ahead of burden

Funding per capita (3rd) outpaces measured fire burden (37th) — resources appear well ahead of current risk.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (42 %, 38th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
2.9 per 1k
14th
8th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire deaths per 100k
0.8 per 100k
20th
11th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
4.5 per 100k
26th
14th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire property loss per capita
$66
24th
13th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Population in poverty
19.6%
88th
45th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
19.3%
74th
38th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
42%
74th
38th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
48%
84th
43rd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Social vulnerability index
0.75
96th
49th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$14
70th
15th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$191
70th
16th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$59
98th
2nd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3.8 per 1k
76th
11th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationModeled estimate
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
81%
1st
51st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Alabama stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.