Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Vermont
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Vermont

27th of 51Stable-3 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
27th
vs. national avg
+0
Region
Northeast
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Vermont ranks 27th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it near the national middle. Its composite of 55 sits 0 points above the national average of 54.6. Vermont is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 9 points below what its risk profile would predict. Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require. Vermont ranks 24th in funding per capita and 30th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
39 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
51 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
52 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
24
12
18
Burden+24 pts
Vulnerability+12 pts
Readiness+18 pts
National Fireground Score55

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-9
actual − expected
Expected 48
Actual 39
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Vermont's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / high funding

Investment exceeds what current fire burden alone would require.

Fire grant funding
$7.7M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$81
24th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$40
per capita
Emergency services investment
$76
per capita
Fire burden rank
30th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
24th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingVT
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+2 since 2020· improvingRank fell 3 · 2427

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Vermont's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire incidents per 1,000 residents ranks 18th nationally (3.8 per 1k) — a top differentiator for Vermont.

Biggest weakness

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 36th of 51 (40 USD), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Investment ahead of burden

Funding per capita (24th) outpaces measured fire burden (30th) — resources appear well ahead of current risk.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 44th percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (35 %, 30th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
3.8 per 1k
34th
18th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1 per 100k
38th
20th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
6.6 per 100k
50th
26th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$99
50th
26th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
15.1%
50th
26th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
17%
52nd
27th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
35%
54th
30th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
36%
62nd
32nd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.50
50th
27th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$12
44th
29th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$159
44th
29th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$40
28th
36th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.9 per 1k
44th
29th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationModeled estimate
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
95%
46th
28th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Vermont stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.