Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Massachusetts
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Massachusetts

13th of 51Falling-4 ranksMedium data coverage
National rank
13th
vs. national avg
+7
Region
Northeast
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Massachusetts ranks 13th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the upper tier nationally. Its composite of 62 sits 7 points above the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by solid readiness and funding. Notably, Massachusetts is underperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 13 points above what its risk profile would predict — a signal worth investigating. Investment is aligned with an elevated fire burden. Massachusetts ranks 2nd in funding per capita and 13th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
54 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
42 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
84 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
18
15
29
Burden+18 pts
Vulnerability+15 pts
Readiness+29 pts
National Fireground Score62

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Underperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially higher than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
+13
actual − expected
Expected 41
Actual 54
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Massachusetts's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / high funding

Investment is aligned with an elevated fire burden.

Fire grant funding
$105.7M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$100
2nd nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$63
per capita
Emergency services investment
$89
per capita
Fire burden rank
13th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
2nd
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingMA
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score-1 since 2020· worseningRank fell 3 · 1013

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Massachusetts's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 1st nationally (63 USD) — a top differentiator for Massachusetts.

Biggest weakness

Fire incidents per 1,000 residents ranks 43rd of 51 (6.6 per 1k), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Risk factor to monitor

Actual burden exceeds expected by ~13 points; track whether response capacity or prevention is closing the gap year over year.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
6.6 per 1k
82nd
43rd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.5 per 100k
76th
39th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
8.5 per 100k
66th
34th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$132
76th
40th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
12.9%
28th
15th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
15.5%
22nd
13th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
28%
28th
17th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
28%
32nd
19th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.37
16th
9th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$15
76th
13th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$219
96th
3rd2024U.S. Census BureauPartial coverage
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$63
100th
1st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
4 per 1k
86th
6th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
88%
16th
43rd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Massachusetts stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.