Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Oregon
0/ 100
Strong
National Fireground Score · 2024

Oregon

6th of 51Rising+10 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
6th
vs. national avg
+10
Region
West
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Oregon ranks 6th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the upper tier nationally. Its composite of 65 sits 10 points above the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by a comparatively low fire burden. Oregon is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 11 points below what its risk profile would predict. Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden. Oregon ranks 41st in funding per capita and 47th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
26 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
31 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
52 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
30
17
18
Burden+30 pts
Vulnerability+17 pts
Readiness+18 pts
National Fireground Score65

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-11
actual − expected
Expected 37
Actual 26
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Oregon's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / low funding

Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden.

Fire grant funding
$45.8M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$65
41st nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$38
per capita
Emergency services investment
$78
per capita
Fire burden rank
47th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
41st
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingOR
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+3 since 2020· improvingRank fell 3 · 36

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Oregon's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire injuries per 100k ranks 1st nationally (2.4 per 100k) — a top differentiator for Oregon.

Biggest weakness

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 39th of 51 (38 USD), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 32nd percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (19 %, 3rd) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
2.7 per 1k
10th
6th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
0.6 per 100k
8th
9th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
2.4 per 100k
1st
1st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$33
2nd
2nd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
9.3%
6th
5th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
13.6%
1st
1st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
19%
2nd
3rd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
14%
2nd
2nd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Social vulnerability index
0.30
2nd
2nd2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$11
32nd
34th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$149
40th
31st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$38
24th
39th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.5 per 1k
32nd
35th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
97%
78th
10th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Oregon stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.