Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/California
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

California

10th of 51Rising+2 ranksMedium data coverage
National rank
10th
vs. national avg
+7
Region
West
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

California ranks 10th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the upper tier nationally. Its composite of 62 sits 7 points above the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by solid readiness and funding and a comparatively low fire burden. California is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 10 points below what its risk profile would predict. Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden. California ranks 33rd in funding per capita and 38th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
34 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
47 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
64 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
26
13
22
Burden+26 pts
Vulnerability+13 pts
Readiness+22 pts
National Fireground Score62

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-10
actual − expected
Expected 44
Actual 34
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from California's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / low funding

Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden.

Fire grant funding
$491M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$73
33rd nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$41
per capita
Emergency services investment
$71
per capita
Fire burden rank
38th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
33rd
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingCA
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score-3 since 2020· worseningRank fell 3 · 710

Risers & fallers reflect movement in California's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire injuries per 100k ranks 10th nationally (3.9 per 100k) — a top differentiator for California.

Biggest weakness

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 31st of 51 (41 USD), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (29 %, 18th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
4.1 per 1k
40th
21st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
0.8 per 100k
20th
12th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
3.9 per 100k
18th
10th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$77
32nd
17th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
12.8%
26th
14th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
15.5%
22nd
12th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
29%
34th
18th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
32%
44th
23rd2024U.S. Census BureauPartial coverage
Social vulnerability index
0.50
50th
26th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$13
50th
26th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$162
46th
28th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$41
34th
31st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3 per 1k
48th
26th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
91%
22nd
39th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where California stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.