Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/New Hampshire
0/ 100
Watch
National Fireground Score · 2024

New Hampshire

49th of 51RisingLow data coverage
National rank
49th
vs. national avg
-14
Region
Northeast
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

New Hampshire ranks 49th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it among the weakest in the country. Its composite of 41 sits 14 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by above-median community vulnerability. On expected-vs-actual, New Hampshire performs close to what its conditions predict. Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries. New Hampshire ranks 32nd in funding per capita and 10th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
56 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
72 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
48 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
18
17
Burden+18 pts
Vulnerability+7 pts
Readiness+17 pts
National Fireground Score41

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Near expected range

Actual fire burden tracks closely with what conditions predict.

Residual
-2
actual − expected
Expected 58
Actual 56
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from New Hampshire's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / low funding

Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries.

Fire grant funding
$16.4M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$75
32nd nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$44
per capita
Emergency services investment
$76
per capita
Fire burden rank
10th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
32nd
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingNH
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score0 since 2020· worseningRank unchanged · 4949

Risers & fallers reflect movement in New Hampshire's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 25th nationally (44 USD) — a top differentiator for New Hampshire.

Biggest weakness

Population in poverty ranks 49th of 51 (20.4 %), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Funding mismatch

New Hampshire carries a high fire burden (10th) but ranks only 32nd in funding per capita — the central accountability question for its leaders.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 42nd percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (44 %, 44th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
6 per 1k
70th
37th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire deaths per 100k
1.7 per 100k
90th
46th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
10.2 per 100k
88th
45th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire property loss per capita
$138
90th
46th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Population in poverty
20.4%
96th
49th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
19.6%
76th
39th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
44%
82nd
44th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
46%
78th
41st2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Social vulnerability index
0.67
74th
38th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$12
42nd
30th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$136
30th
35th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$44
50th
25th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.4 per 1k
28th
37th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationModeled estimate
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
83%
2nd
49th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where New Hampshire stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.