Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Idaho

30th of 51Rising+5 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
30th
vs. national avg
-1
Region
West
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Idaho ranks 30th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it near the national middle. Its composite of 54 sits 1 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by above-median community vulnerability. Idaho is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 17 points below what its risk profile would predict. Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden. Idaho ranks 28th in funding per capita and 28th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
42 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
61 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
60 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
23
21
Burden+23 pts
Vulnerability+10 pts
Readiness+21 pts
National Fireground Score54

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-17
actual − expected
Expected 59
Actual 42
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Idaho's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
Low burden / low funding

Lower funding accompanies a lower measured fire burden.

Fire grant funding
$27.2M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$79
28th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$41
per capita
Emergency services investment
$86
per capita
Fire burden rank
28th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
28th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingID
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+3 since 2020· improvingRank unchanged · 3030

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Idaho's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Federal fire grant funding per capita ranks 18th nationally (13.9 USD) — a top differentiator for Idaho.

Biggest weakness

Population age 65+ ranks 37th of 51 (19 %), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (36 %, 32nd) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
5.2 per 1k
56th
29th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.3 per 100k
58th
31st2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
6.8 per 100k
52nd
27th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$87
38th
20th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
16.2%
62nd
32nd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
19%
72nd
37th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
36%
62nd
32nd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
44%
72nd
37th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.63
70th
36th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$14
66th
18th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$179
58th
22nd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$41
34th
33rd2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3 per 1k
48th
27th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
93%
28th
34th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Idaho stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.