Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Wisconsin
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Wisconsin

36th of 51Rising+5 ranksMedium data coverage
National rank
36th
vs. national avg
-3
Region
Midwest
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Wisconsin ranks 36th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it near the national middle. Its composite of 52 sits 3 points below the national average of 54.6. Wisconsin is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 11 points below what its risk profile would predict. Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries. Wisconsin ranks 40th in funding per capita and 26th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
43 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
56 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
53 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
23
19
Burden+23 pts
Vulnerability+11 pts
Readiness+19 pts
National Fireground Score52

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-11
actual − expected
Expected 54
Actual 43
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Wisconsin's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / low funding

Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries.

Fire grant funding
$65.6M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$67
40th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$40
per capita
Emergency services investment
$75
per capita
Fire burden rank
26th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
40th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingWI
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+4 since 2020· improvingRank rose 2 · 3836

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Wisconsin's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire injuries per 100k ranks 22nd nationally (6.1 per 100k) — a top differentiator for Wisconsin.

Biggest weakness

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 37th of 51 (40 USD), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Funding mismatch

Wisconsin carries a high fire burden (26th) but ranks only 40th in funding per capita — the central accountability question for its leaders.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 36th percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (35 %, 31st) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
5.3 per 1k
58th
31st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.3 per 100k
58th
36th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
6.1 per 100k
42nd
22nd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire property loss per capita
$106
58th
30th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Population in poverty
15.3%
52nd
28th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
17.9%
58th
31st2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
35%
54th
31st2024U.S. Census BureauPartial coverage
Rural population
32%
44th
25th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.48
44th
24th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyPartial coverage
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$11
36th
33rd2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$137
34th
34th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$40
28th
37th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.7 per 1k
38th
32nd2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationPartial coverage
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
93%
28th
37th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Wisconsin stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.