Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/North Dakota
0/ 100
Watch
National Fireground Score · 2024

North Dakota

45th of 51Falling-5 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
45th
vs. national avg
-12
Region
Midwest
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

North Dakota ranks 45th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the lower tier nationally. Its composite of 43 sits 12 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by thin readiness and funding. Notably, North Dakota is underperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 6 points above what its risk profile would predict — a signal worth investigating. Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries. North Dakota ranks 44th in funding per capita and 9th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
56 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
52 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
39 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
18
14
Burden+18 pts
Vulnerability+12 pts
Readiness+14 pts
National Fireground Score43

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Underperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially higher than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
+6
actual − expected
Expected 50
Actual 56
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from North Dakota's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / low funding

Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries.

Fire grant funding
$7.3M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$61
44th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$31
per capita
Emergency services investment
$61
per capita
Fire burden rank
9th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
44th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingND
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+1 since 2020· improvingRank rose 1 · 4645

Risers & fallers reflect movement in North Dakota's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Rural population ranks 20th nationally (28 %) — a top differentiator for North Dakota.

Biggest weakness

Fire incidents per 1,000 residents ranks 48th of 51 (7.1 per 1k), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Funding mismatch

North Dakota carries a high fire burden (9th) but ranks only 44th in funding per capita — the central accountability question for its leaders.

Grant opportunity

Federal fire grant funding per capita sits in the 18th percentile — headroom to compete for AFG, SAFER, and mitigation dollars.

Risk factor to monitor

Actual burden exceeds expected by ~6 points; track whether response capacity or prevention is closing the gap year over year.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
7.1 per 1k
92nd
48th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.5 per 100k
76th
40th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionReported
Fire injuries per 100k
8.8 per 100k
72nd
37th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire property loss per capita
$117
68th
36th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
15.7%
58th
31st2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Population age 65+
16.6%
46th
24th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
35%
54th
28th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
28%
32nd
20th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.52
54th
28th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$9
18th
42nd2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$127
22nd
40th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$31
8th
47th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
2.2 per 1k
22nd
40th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
99%
92nd
3rd2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where North Dakota stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.