Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Missouri
0/ 100
Watch
National Fireground Score · 2024

Missouri

47th of 51Rising+1 rankLow data coverage
National rank
47th
vs. national avg
-14
Region
Midwest
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Missouri ranks 47th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it among the weakest in the country. Its composite of 41 sits 14 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by an elevated fire burden and above-median community vulnerability. Notably, Missouri is underperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 8 points above what its risk profile would predict — a signal worth investigating. Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries. Missouri ranks 30th in funding per capita and 2nd in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
68 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
70 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
60 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
13
21
Burden+13 pts
Vulnerability+8 pts
Readiness+21 pts
National Fireground Score41

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Underperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially higher than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
+8
actual − expected
Expected 60
Actual 68
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Missouri's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / low funding

Funding does not appear to match the fire risk this state carries.

Fire grant funding
$86.5M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$77
30th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$49
per capita
Emergency services investment
$87
per capita
Fire burden rank
2nd
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
30th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingMO
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score+3 since 2020· improvingRank rose 1 · 4847

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Missouri's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 16th nationally (49 USD) — a top differentiator for Missouri.

Biggest weakness

Fire incidents per 1,000 residents ranks 51st of 51 (8.5 per 1k), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Funding mismatch

Missouri carries a high fire burden (2nd) but ranks only 30th in funding per capita — the central accountability question for its leaders.

Risk factor to monitor

Actual burden exceeds expected by ~8 points; track whether response capacity or prevention is closing the gap year over year.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
8.5 per 1k
100th
51st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire deaths per 100k
1.8 per 100k
94th
50th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
12.2 per 100k
100th
51st2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Fire property loss per capita
$168
98th
50th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationModeled estimate
Population in poverty
19%
82nd
42nd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
20.2%
84th
43rd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Housing built before 1970
44%
82nd
43rd2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Rural population
51%
96th
49th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Social vulnerability index
0.69
78th
42nd2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$14
68th
17th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$165
48th
26th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$49
68th
16th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3.3 per 1k
58th
22nd2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationModeled estimate
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
85%
6th
47th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Missouri stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.