Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Sample data for demonstration only.
Scoreboard/Minnesota
0/ 100
Average
National Fireground Score · 2024

Minnesota

40th of 51Stable-2 ranksHigh data coverage
National rank
40th
vs. national avg
-5
Region
Midwest
Data year
2024
Analyst summary · auto-generated

Minnesota ranks 40th of 51 on the National Fireground Score, placing it in the lower tier nationally. Its composite of 50 sits 5 points below the national average of 54.6. The score is shaped most by solid readiness and funding and above-median community vulnerability. Minnesota is outperforming expectations: actual fire burden runs roughly 11 points below what its risk profile would predict. Investment is aligned with an elevated fire burden. Minnesota ranks 18th in funding per capita and 11th in fire burden.

Generated from this state's sourced metrics. In production, the narrative is produced by the Fireground Analytics engine.

What drives the score

Score breakdown

Three sub-scores combine into the composite. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Fire Burden40% weight
55 · nat 43
How hard is fire hitting this state relative to its size? Lower is better.
Fire Vulnerability25% weight
80 · nat 54
How exposed is this community to fire loss? Lower is better.
Fire Readiness35% weight
78 · nat 58
How well-resourced is this state for its risk? Higher is better.
How it builds the composite
18
27
Burden+18 pts
Vulnerability+5 pts
Readiness+27 pts
National Fireground Score50

Composite = 0.40 × (100 − Burden) + 0.25 × (100 − Vulnerability) + 0.35 × Readiness. Burden and Vulnerability are inverted so that a higher composite always means a stronger position.

Signature analysis

Expected vs. actual performance

Is this state doing better or worse than its risk profile predicts?

Expected vs. actual fire burden
Outperforming expectations

Actual fire burden is materially lower than its risk profile predicts.

Residual
-11
actual − expected
Expected 66
Actual 55
Lower burden →← Higher burden

Expected burden is modeled from Minnesota's vulnerability and demographic profile. A marker left of the band means fewer fire losses than conditions predict; right of the band means more. This is a benchmark signal, not a finding of cause. In production this model is the Fireground Analytics risk-adjusted engine.

Accountability

Funding & the burden it has to match

Grants, per-capita funding, and tax revenue set against the fire burden this state actually carries.

Accountability classification
High burden / high funding

Investment is aligned with an elevated fire burden.

Fire grant funding
$90.7M
federal, total
Funding per capita
$83
18th nationally
Fire tax / district revenue
$53
per capita
Emergency services investment
$93
per capita
Fire burden rank
11th
1 = highest burden
Funding rank
18th
1 = most funded

Are we funding fire service at a level that matches our risk?

Burden vs. funding — all 51 jurisdictions
High burden · low fundingHigh burden · high fundingLow burden · low fundingLow burden · high fundingMN
← Less fundedMore funded →
Context

How it compares

Regional peers, similar-population states, and similar-vulnerability states — measured against the same benchmark.

Open full compare →
5-year fireground score-2 since 2020· worseningRank fell 1 · 3940

Risers & fallers reflect movement in Minnesota's national position over the trailing five reporting years.

What to investigate next

Key insights

Sharp, sourced takeaways a chief or council member could act on.

Biggest strength

Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita ranks 6th nationally (53 USD) — a top differentiator for Minnesota.

Biggest weakness

Population in poverty ranks 50th of 51 (21.2 %), the metric dragging hardest on the composite.

Risk factor to monitor

Housing built before 1970 (48 %, 47th) is a structural vulnerability worth watching as housing and demographics shift.

Full transparency

Every metric, every source

The complete sourced dataset behind this report card. Each figure links to its public origin.

Every figure is traceable to a public source
MetricValueState percentileNat. rankYearSourceQuality
Fire incidents per 1,000 residents
6.7 per 1k
88th
45th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire deaths per 100k
1.6 per 100k
82nd
44th2024Centers for Disease Control and PreventionModeled estimate
Fire injuries per 100k
9.9 per 100k
84th
44th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Fire property loss per capita
$135
86th
45th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Population in poverty
21.2%
98th
50th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Population age 65+
20.7%
96th
49th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Housing built before 1970
48%
92nd
47th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Rural population
52%
98th
50th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Social vulnerability index
0.72
94th
48th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyModeled estimate
Federal fire grant funding per capita
$16
82nd
10th2024Federal Emergency Management AgencyReported
Fire protection expenditure per capita
$199
76th
13th2024U.S. Census BureauModeled estimate
Fire tax / special-district revenue per capita
$53
88th
6th2024U.S. Census BureauReported
Firefighters per 1,000 residents
3.9 per 1k
82nd
9th2024U.S. Fire Administration; National Fire Protection AssociationReported
NFIRS / NERIS reporting completeness
97%
78th
8th2024U.S. Fire AdministrationReported
Powered by Fireground Analytics

Go deeper than the public scorecard

The National Fireground Scorecard shows where Minnesota stands. Fireground Analytics shows the counties, departments, and decisions behind it — and what to do next.

Advanced analytics by Fireground Analytics. Public scores remain free, neutral, and fully sourced.

Sample data for demonstration only — not real rankings. See the methodology and sources. An initiative of Fireground Analytics.