Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Combination county system (career + volunteer)

Howard County Department of Fire and Rescue Services

Howard · combination · Provides EMS transport · reporting year 2024

Data confidence: High (81/100) · 8/11 fields
7 county-staffed + 7 combination stationsALS transport
Population served
339,668
Area protected
250.95 sq mi
Population densitycalc
1,354/sq mi
Annual incidents
44,018
EMS share of calls
Unknown
Stations
14
Career personnel
517
Volunteer personnel
Unknown
Typical on-duty staffing
Unknown
Operating budget
$163.4M
Funding per residentcalc
$481/resident

“calc” = calculated from verified inputs: density = population ÷ area; funding per resident = budget ÷ population.

Organization descriptors

Resource capacity
51/100

size of the organization (percentile among MD systems)

Operational scale
57/100

workload handled (percentile) — not quality

Data confidence
81/100

how much verified public data backs it

These describe size and workload, not performance. A larger or busier department is not “better” — the peer list exists precisely so any comparison is against organizations of similar scale.

Five closest peers

Frederick County Division of Fire and Rescue Services

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Frederick

Similarity 75/100
299,317
Population served
38,000
Annual incidents
30
Stations
  • Comparable career personnel (517 vs 581).
  • Comparable population served (339,668 vs 299,317).
  • Comparable annual incident volume (44,018 vs 38,000).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 453).
  • Different area protected (sq mi) (251 vs 661).

Matched on 6 shared verified fields.

Harford County Division of Emergency Services (Fire & EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Harford

Similarity 66/100
265,514
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
12
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 12).
  • Different career personnel (517 vs 150).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 607).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Charles County Department of Emergency Services (Fire/EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Charles

Similarity 62/100
174,478
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
15
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 15).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 381).
  • Different population served (339,668 vs 174,478).

Matched on 4 shared verified fields.

Anne Arundel County Fire Department

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Anne Arundel

Similarity 57/100
602,350
Population served
89,121
Annual incidents
31
Stations
  • Comparable population density (1,354 vs 1,452).
  • Comparable operating budget ($163,400,000 vs $199,750,000).
  • Different number of stations (14 vs 31).
  • Different annual incident volume (44,018 vs 89,121).

Matched on 7 shared verified fields.

Washington County Division of Emergency Services (Fire & Rescue)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Washington

Similarity 55/100
157,228
Population served
36,951
Annual incidents
9
Stations
  • Comparable annual incident volume (44,018 vs 36,951).
  • Different career personnel (517 vs 92).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 344).

Matched on 6 shared verified fields.

Adjacent size baselines

Charles County Department of Emergency Services (Fire/EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Charles

Adjacent smaller
174,478
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
15
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 15).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 381).
  • Different population served (339,668 vs 174,478).

Matched on 4 shared verified fields.

Frederick County Division of Fire and Rescue Services

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Frederick

Adjacent larger
299,317
Population served
38,000
Annual incidents
30
Stations
  • Comparable career personnel (517 vs 581).
  • Comparable population served (339,668 vs 299,317).
  • Comparable annual incident volume (44,018 vs 38,000).
  • Different population density (1,354 vs 453).
  • Different area protected (sq mi) (251 vs 661).

Matched on 6 shared verified fields.

Sources & transparency

Every value above is a verified public figure or is shown as “Unknown” — nothing is estimated. Excluded from comparison: 0 incompatible-type organizations (a countywide system is never compared with a single volunteer company).