Cecil County Department of Emergency Services (Fire/EMS)
Cecil · combination · Partial EMS transport · reporting year 2025
- Population served
- 106,305↗
- Area protected
- 346.3 sq mi↗
- Population densitycalc
- 307/sq mi↗
- Annual incidents
- Unknown
- EMS share of calls
- Unknown
- Stations
- Unknown
- Career personnel
- Unknown
- Volunteer personnel
- Unknown
- Typical on-duty staffing
- Unknown
- Operating budget
- Unknown
- Funding per residentcalc
- Unknown
“calc” = calculated from verified inputs: density = population ÷ area; funding per resident = budget ÷ population.
Organization descriptors
size of the organization (percentile among MD systems)
workload handled (percentile) — not quality
how much verified public data backs it
These describe size and workload, not performance. A larger or busier department is not “better” — the peer list exists precisely so any comparison is against organizations of similar scale.
Five closest peers
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · St. Mary's
- Comparable area protected (sq mi) (346 vs 359).
- Comparable population density (307 vs 325).
- Comparable population served (106,305 vs 116,469).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Calvert
- Comparable population served (106,305 vs 94,913).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Washington
- Comparable population density (307 vs 344).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Volunteer-based county system · Charles
- Comparable population density (307 vs 381).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Carroll
- Closest available match within the same comparison class; limited shared data — treat with caution.
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Adjacent size baselines
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Calvert
- Comparable population served (106,305 vs 94,913).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Washington
- Comparable population density (307 vs 344).
- EMS transport role differs (partial vs full).
Matched on 3 shared verified fields.
Sources & transparency
Every value above is a verified public figure or is shown as “Unknown” — nothing is estimated. Excluded from comparison: 0 incompatible-type organizations (a countywide system is never compared with a single volunteer company).
- U.S. Census Bureau — Population Estimates Program (PEP) Vintage 2024 — county + place resident estimates · 2024 · accessed 2026-07-16
- U.S. Census Bureau — 2024 Gazetteer — county + place land area (ALAND_SQMI) · 2024 · accessed 2026-07-16
- • This organization has limited verified public data; matches are directional, not definitive.