Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Combination county system (career + volunteer)

Carroll County Department of Fire and Emergency Services

Carroll · combination · Provides EMS transport · reporting year 2026

Data confidence: High (75/100) · 7/11 fields
County dept (est. 2020) over 14 volunteer companiesCareer paramedic ambulances
Population served
177,108
Area protected
447.615 sq mi
Population densitycalc
396/sq mi
Annual incidents
Unknown
EMS share of calls
Unknown
Stations
14
Career personnel
186
Volunteer personnel
Unknown
Typical on-duty staffing
Unknown
Operating budget
$35.2M
Funding per residentcalc
$199/resident

“calc” = calculated from verified inputs: density = population ÷ area; funding per resident = budget ÷ population.

Organization descriptors

Resource capacity
44/100

size of the organization (percentile among MD systems)

Operational scale
60/100

workload handled (percentile) — not quality

Data confidence
75/100

how much verified public data backs it

These describe size and workload, not performance. A larger or busier department is not “better” — the peer list exists precisely so any comparison is against organizations of similar scale.

Five closest peers

Charles County Department of Emergency Services (Fire/EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Charles

Similarity 97/100
174,478
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
15
Stations
  • Comparable population served (177,108 vs 174,478).
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 458).
  • Comparable population density (396 vs 381).
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 15).

Matched on 4 shared verified fields.

Harford County Division of Emergency Services (Fire & EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Harford

Similarity 77/100
265,514
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
12
Stations
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 437).
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 12).
  • Comparable career personnel (186 vs 150).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Washington County Division of Emergency Services (Fire & Rescue)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Washington

Similarity 76/100
157,228
Population served
36,951
Annual incidents
9
Stations
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 458).
  • Comparable population served (177,108 vs 157,228).
  • Comparable population density (396 vs 344).
  • Different career personnel (186 vs 92).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

St. Mary's County Fire & Rescue (Emergency Services)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · St. Mary's

Similarity 76/100
116,469
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
13
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 13).
  • Comparable population density (396 vs 325).
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 359).

Matched on 4 shared verified fields.

Cecil County Department of Emergency Services (Fire/EMS)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Cecil

Similarity 65/100
106,305
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
Unknown
Stations
  • Closest available match within the same comparison class; limited shared data — treat with caution.
  • EMS transport role differs (full vs partial).

Matched on 3 shared verified fields.

Adjacent size baselines

St. Mary's County Fire & Rescue (Emergency Services)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · St. Mary's

Adjacent smaller
116,469
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
13
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 13).
  • Comparable population density (396 vs 325).
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 359).

Matched on 4 shared verified fields.

Harford County Division of Emergency Services (Fire & EMS)

Volunteer-based county system · Harford

Adjacent larger
265,514
Population served
Unknown
Annual incidents
12
Stations
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (448 vs 437).
  • Comparable number of stations (14 vs 12).
  • Comparable career personnel (186 vs 150).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Sources & transparency

Every value above is a verified public figure or is shown as “Unknown” — nothing is estimated. Excluded from comparison: 0 incompatible-type organizations (a countywide system is never compared with a single volunteer company).