Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
NFPA staffing benchmark/Montgomery County
County jurisdiction

Montgomery County

Context: Montgomery County Fire and Rescue Service (MCFRS), 19 Local Fire and Rescue Departments (LFRDs), IAFF Local 1664. These names explain governance/deployment only — this jurisdiction is assessed once, not once per department or company.

Standards of Cover / accreditation document ↗

NFPA Staffing Benchmark

Staffing-only · not a response-time or legal assessment
Governing benchmark
NFPA 1750:2026 · combination-department provisions
NFPA 1750:2026, career-department provisions (Ch. 4–6, §1.3)
Baseline minimum: 4 on-duty per company (baseline)
Higher (zone/hazard) minimum: not assessed (needs sourced zone/hazard evidence)
Publicly reported on-duty staffing
3 per engine (minimum; standard/target is 4)Verified

Policy #25-08AMII §5.a: 'Minimum Staffing Levels — Apparatus Type: Engines, trucks/aerials, and rescue squads — Number of Personnel: 3.' Effective Oct. 3, 2016; a Wayback Machine capture-digest check confirms the file was served unchanged from 2016-10-20 through 2025-03-20. The live montgomerycountymd.gov URL now 404s (site reorganization), so this was retrieved via its archived capture; content is a genuine, dated, Fire-Chief-signed county policy, independently corroborated by the 2018 MCFRS Standards of Cover (p.193: 'Minimum daily staffing levels for engine companies: 3 personnel'; p.79-80: apparatus-by-apparatus roster). §5.b separately states a 4-person 'Standard Staffing' target — recorded as typicalDailyStaffing below, not substituted for the 3-person binding floor.

Assessment · baseline company staffing
Below applicable company staffing benchmark

Disclosed on-duty staffing (3 per engine (minimum; standard/target is 4)) is below the NFPA 1750:2026 baseline of 4 per company (applied to the career companies), per Montgomery County Fire and Rescue Service (Fire Chief Scott E. Goldstein). Higher zone/risk company minimums (elevated 5, maximal 6), the effective response force, and response-time objectives were not assessed. Benchmark comparison only — not a legal compliance finding.

Not assessed
  • Higher-risk (zone/hazard) staffing requirement not assessed
  • Effective response force not assessed
  • Response-time performance not assessed

Baseline company-staffing benchmark only. Higher zone/risk company minimums (elevated 5, maximal 6), the effective response force, and response-time objectives were not assessed. NFPA 1750 is a consensus standard unless adopted by the local Authority Having Jurisdiction.

NFPA 1750:2026 is a consensus deployment standard, not automatically a legal mandate. A department is legally bound only where its Authority Having Jurisdiction has adopted it. This assesses baseline company staffing only — not higher zone/risk staffing, effective response force, or response-time performance — and is not a legal finding.