Fireground IndexPowered by Fireground Analytics
Independent municipal department

Hagerstown Fire Department

Washington · combination · No EMS transport (separate provider) · reporting year 2025

Data confidence: Moderate (68/100) · 6/11 fields
Primarily career with volunteer supportEMS transport by a separate nonprofit
Population served
43,909
Area protected
12.921 sq mi
Population densitycalc
3,398/sq mi
Annual incidents
Unknown
EMS share of calls
Unknown
Stations
6
Career personnel
69
Volunteer personnel
Unknown
Typical on-duty staffing
15
Operating budget
Unknown
Funding per residentcalc
Unknown

“calc” = calculated from verified inputs: density = population ÷ area; funding per resident = budget ÷ population.

Organization descriptors

Resource capacity
27/100

size of the organization (percentile among MD systems)

Operational scale
21/100

workload handled (percentile) — not quality

Data confidence
68/100

how much verified public data backs it

These describe size and workload, not performance. A larger or busier department is not “better” — the peer list exists precisely so any comparison is against organizations of similar scale.

Five closest peers

Salisbury Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Wicomico

Similarity 76/100
33,616
Population served
13,581
Annual incidents
3
Stations
  • Comparable career personnel (69 vs 72).
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (13 vs 14).
  • Different number of stations (6 vs 3).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Annapolis Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Anne Arundel

Similarity 69/100
40,689
Population served
13,626
Annual incidents
3
Stations
  • Comparable population served (43,909 vs 40,689).
  • Different number of stations (6 vs 3).
  • Different career personnel (69 vs 137).
  • Staffing model differs (combination vs career).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Calvert County Fire-Rescue-EMS (Public Safety)

Combination county system (career + volunteer) · Calvert

Similarity 60/100
94,913
Population served
13,825
Annual incidents
7
Stations
  • Comparable career personnel (69 vs 69).
  • Comparable number of stations (6 vs 7).
  • Different area protected (sq mi) (13 vs 213).
  • Different population density (3,398 vs 445).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Cumberland Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Allegany

Similarity 51/100
18,643
Population served
7,691
Annual incidents
2
Stations
  • Closest available match within the same comparison class; limited shared data — treat with caution.
  • Different number of stations (6 vs 2).
  • Different population served (43,909 vs 18,643).
  • Staffing model differs (combination vs career).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Ocean City Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Worcester

Similarity 45/100
6,884
Population served
7,000
Annual incidents
5
Stations
  • Comparable number of stations (6 vs 5).
  • Different population served (43,909 vs 6,884).
  • Different area protected (sq mi) (13 vs 4).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Adjacent size baselines

Salisbury Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Wicomico

Adjacent smaller
33,616
Population served
13,581
Annual incidents
3
Stations
  • Comparable career personnel (69 vs 72).
  • Comparable area protected (sq mi) (13 vs 14).
  • Different number of stations (6 vs 3).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Annapolis Fire Department

Independent municipal department · Anne Arundel

Adjacent larger
40,689
Population served
13,626
Annual incidents
3
Stations
  • Comparable population served (43,909 vs 40,689).
  • Different number of stations (6 vs 3).
  • Different career personnel (69 vs 137).
  • Staffing model differs (combination vs career).
  • EMS transport role differs (none vs full).

Matched on 5 shared verified fields.

Sources & transparency

Every value above is a verified public figure or is shown as “Unknown” — nothing is estimated. Excluded from comparison: 0 incompatible-type organizations (a countywide system is never compared with a single volunteer company).